2025年2月雅思写作预测题：大作文预测重点及范文

2025年1月雅思纸笔考试共有3个场次，下文羊驼小编整理了1月雅思写作大作文可能考试的重点题目以及对应的范文，以供参考。希望能对各位烤鸭们有所帮助。

小作文：多练习折线图和地图

大作文重点

1.Film stars and celebrities often share their views on public matters that have little to do with their profession. Is this a positive or negative development?(电影明星和名人经常在与他们的职业无关的公共事务上分享他们的观点。这是一种积极的发展还是一种消极的发展？)

Nowadays it is very commonly seen how the reel-life stars and celebrities opine about almost every affair which may not be relevant to their career and stream of the profession and has caused a major impact among the people who look up to them. I believe it is a negative development, and in the following paragraphs, I shall propagate my viewpoints on this phenomenon.

Film stars and reel-personalities are often found basking in the spotlight and availing themselves of immense popularity and fame. Due to this, they being offered to promulgate a specific brand, which might not be as inept as is portrayed by them, is a common sight. Sometimes even the political parties approach them for their respective candidates’ endorsement and back the political groups up. In addition to that, at times, they are even seen engrossed in making certain cheapskate comments about certain important events which they hardly know even an iota about. According to me, it is ghastly awful and utterly grievous as it could make the vulnerable strata of the society get coaxed and goaded in a dastardly way. The incidents of mass-rioting and hooliganism borne from the seedling of a controversial remark don’t get out of notice.

It is undoubtedly known how celebrities and media personalities have a huge fan following. Right from a kid to the elderly, these film personalities possess a gamut of fanbases all across the world. In such a scenario, it becomes all the more important for these celebrities to encumber their opinions primarily to their specific range and respective domain i.e media and films as they are proclaimed for their entertainment proficiency and not their opinions on subsidiary things. Many a time, certain ingenuous and tactless masses fall prey to the standards of thoughts these personalities set forth. Often to radiate the similitude with them, ingenuous mass falls miserably and gets misled to think in an anomalous way and incline towards an unwarranted streak of thoughts. Therefore, I believe that the film stars and people alike should be watchful of what they present and peddle out to the world and more so, should try to keep them specific to their domain of expertise.

Some might say that it is a free world, and everyone is entitled to their opinions and has a right to quote their thoughts. However, with fame and fandom comes a responsibility along. Hence, such renowned and acclaimed faces should try to eschew making remarks that could potentially make a sensation, especially when it is out of their radar of adroitness.

Conclusively, we may hence say that celebrities and media personalities should be particular about what they speak and how they put across their thoughts and, even better, that they abstain from getting into the zone that they aren’t related to.

2.Some people think that employers should not be concerned about how employees dress at work, but the quality of work only. To what extent do you agree or disagree?(有些人认为雇主不应该关心员工在工作时的着装，而只关心工作的质量。你在多大程度上同意或不同意？)

Professional clothes and dressing sense at work have persistently been a subject of dispute among people. Some people consider that the organizations’ administrators and the higher management should not be bothered about how the employees dress. I disagree with this notion and realize the essence of business attire at work. In the following paragraph, I shall further my opinions on this viewpoint.

The very essence of having business attire and the fundamental emergence of professional dressing is to invoke a sense of uniformity and constancy among all. The incidents of people forming opinions and at times getting engrossed in chatting about one’s choice of outfit is rife and has been time and again seen denigrating one and making them rate low on self-esteem. This causes mental fatigue in an individual trying to match up with a standardized dressing norm. Moreover, in this process, it has been seen how the efficacy of an individual extenuates upon thinking about such insignificant and paltry issues. In addition to that, it revitalizes the sense of belonging among colleagues and employees.

An employee is the face of an organization, and how people look upon them reflects organizational standards in the minds of people. Especially, in business meetings, wearing clothes based on comfort might render a sense of discomfort and trigger an ambiance of informality among the employees and the clients as well. Even in business models based on business-to-client modeling, formal wear and having a dressing code is quintessential to the reputation of an organization. Therefore, even from the putative aspect, it is all the more cardinal to have a formal uniform for the employees.

Though some might argue that having a typical dress could at times be quite daunting to put up with, in the long run, this creates a professional work environment without dragging trivial issues like choosing what to wear or if this dress is being repeated or not, in the mainstream.

Conclusively we may say that having a dressing sense is mandatory for an efficient work environment and having a conducive work environment is all that should be a numero uno priority.

3.Some people think that schools are no longer necessary because people can acquire information on the Internet. To what extent do you agree or disagree?(有些人认为学校已经不再有必要了，因为人们可以在互联网上获取信息。你在多大程度上同意或不同意？)

Today’s era is called the internet era which is eponymous with the advancement in the pangs of digital waves all across the world. Education is the most affected sector in the modern world that generally causes people to have a difference of opinion regarding the essence of schools, as most of the information one could find is available online.?However, I partially disagree with this statement. In the paragraphs to follow, I shall discuss my point of view regarding the topic.

The very importance of having an institution and school is not only restricted to imparting and receiving education, but also the sense of uniformity, harmony, belongingness, and brotherhood. With the uniform comes a sense of belonging to the same string of compassion, and that can never be rooted in online education. For instance, the online enrolled students today barely know who their classmates are, let alone their behavior and a sense of bonding among each other. Moreover, helping each other out with doubts, the joy of seeing live cultural activities with a tinge of cultural diversity is unparalleled. Adding to that, a teacher-student bond of respect and second parenthood in an offline medium is extremely precious and valuable.

Undoubtedly, the modern world has seen an upheaval in the education sector, with almost everything in the ambit of digital space. So the essence of having offline institutions such as schools or colleges seems to be redundant. One might get deep subject knowledge through online classes and self-paced learning. However, one shouldn’t overlook the downsides of online education and internet learning. As some say, “Information on the internet today is like an ocean, but not every part of it can be plunged into.” The essence of a teacher guiding the students in an offline medium and live mentorship can never be overshadowed by the haywire content of the internet. Hence, it is incorrect to say that offline institutions are not needed.

In conclusion, we may say that the importance of offline institutions can never be displaced. Though the digital era could be an aiding hand to the offline medium of instructions, an alley can never be a wholesome alternative, and therefore, online education can never overcloud the existence of schools and colleges.

4.Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?(科学研究应该由政府而不是私人公司来进行和控制。你在多大程度上同意或不同意？)

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. You should write at least 250 words.

The growth and development of a nation highly depend upon the advancements that it has achieved in technology and scientific research. For years altogether, private organizations have been taking charge to fund scientific research and regulate them accordingly. While there are some arguments backing up these private companies, my opinion supports those who state that the government should execute the research work. I will outline the reasons in the following paragraphs.

There are a plethora of reasons why the government should take liability for scientific research. To begin with, all of the scientific research, regardless of its scale, requires weighty funding. And, keeping in mind the funds available with the government, it can effortlessly offer financial support to a myriad of experimental projects. Secondly, the fact that these searches have a soaring risk of misfiring cannot be overlooked. In certain situations, some projects may completely collapse a private organization. If it had been a government organization, the chances of coping with the incurred losses would be way more than that of a private organization.

It is even apparent that there are sundry private companies that are willing to invest. However, there could be certain risks associated with it. To put it precisely, in this cut-throat competition era, every company is working with an objective to outpace its competition. While doing so, they may end up completing a project hurriedly, impacting its quality and integrity, merely to earn profit. Such a situation can hamper the lives of the general public to a great extent.

In conclusion, post evaluating all of the aspects of this argument, it is not strenuous to figure out that government funding for scientific research will be way more beneficial than the financial support offered by private companies.

5.Shops should not be allowed to sell any food or drink scientifically proven bad for people’s health. To what extent do you agree or disagree?(商店不应允许商店出售任何科学证明对人们健康有害的食品或饮料。你在多大程度上同意或不同意？)

Science has already exhibited that unhealthy beverages and cuisines should not be accessible to people. Some people also stand true to this statement and agree that shops should not sell any consumable that is not scientifically proven. I agree with this statement. In the upcoming paragraphs, I shall discuss my point of view in detail.

In a way, a majority of people are pinning their hopes on quickly available products. The reasons behind this could be many. To begin with, a massive amount of the young generation lives away from home; hence, they have to buy food and drinks from shops to fill their stomach. In such a scenario, if they end up consuming anything unhealthily, it is only going to offer escalating health issues and distressing diseases, such as obesity, liver and kidney issues, and much more.

Secondly, another noteworthy concern here is the possibility of humiliation that the shopkeepers and business owners may end up facing. In the present era, there is a myriad of food-oriented forums that exist to help. In case anybody raises a concern to higher authorities, a business owner may have to shut down its shop altogether, owing to the lack of education regarding what is safe and what is not. Not to mention, there will be a backfire on the credibility and trustworthiness as well.

Having put forth all of the substantial arguments, it is clear that shops should avoid selling anything unhygienic and non-nutritional, not just to keep their integrity intact but to ensure the health of the consumers as well.