2024年12月7日雅思纸笔考试写作机经及答案

雅思纸笔考试在2024年12月有4个场次，时间分别在12月7日、12月14日、12月21日和12月28日，羊驼雅思整理了12月7日雅思纸笔考试写作考试题目和答案如下。

注意，此考试题目和答案为网友回忆版，和实际考试题目以及顺序可能有出入，仅供参考。听力和阅读考题及答案查看2024年雅思机经：听力、阅读、写作回忆及答案汇总

Writing

TASK 1小作文：表格

1993年和2003年各行业男女性别比例构成表。

TASK 2大作文：论述

One long-distance flight consumes fuel which a car uses in several years’ time, but they cause the same amount of pollution.So some people think that we should discourage non-essential flights, such as tourist travel, rather than to limit the use of cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

一次长途飞行消耗的燃料相当于一辆汽车用几年的时间，但它们造成的污染量相同。因此，一些人认为我们应该阻止非必要的航班，比如旅游，而不是限制汽车的使用。你在多大程度上同意或不同意?

题目解读：

本题讨论是否应取消非必要航班的问题。审题时需注意，第一句话为背景句，无需对此进行论证;第二句话观点句中包含了比较关系，涉及比较双方“限制非必要的航班”和“限制汽车”，在论证时需要对这两方分别展开讨论。持赞同题干观点的一方，可以从航空飞行消耗大量燃料、且多为非日常必需的奢侈性消费、科技进步提供远程会议等替代方案等角度考虑;持反对题干观点的一方，则可以从汽车排放的累积影响、长途飞行的社会和经济效益等方面思考。

参考范文：

In recent years , concerns about environmental pollution have led to debates about the most effective ways to reduce carbon emissions . Some argue that discouraging non-essential flights , such as tourist travel , rather than limiting the use of cars is a more effective approach to combat pollution . While I agree that non-essential flights contribute significantly to carbon emissions , I believe that both air travel and car usage should be limited to mitigate environmental damage .

近年来，对环境污染的担忧引发了关于减少碳排放的最有效方法的争论。一些人认为，减少非必要的航班，如旅游，而不是限制汽车的使用，是对抗污染更有效的方法。虽然我同意非必要航班显著增加了碳排放，但我认为航空旅行和汽车的使用都应该受到限制，以减轻对环境的破坏。

Firstly , it is indisputable that one long-distance flight can consume a substantial amount of fuel , equivalent to several years' worth of car usage . Air planes emit large amounts of greenhouse gases , contributing to climate change and air pollution . Discouraging non-essential flights , especially for leisure purposes , can reduce carbon emissions and help address these environmental issues . Moreover , advancements in technology have made virtual meetings and conference calls a feasible alternative to air travel , further making a case for reducing unnecessary flights .

首先，一次长途飞行可以消耗大量的燃料，相当于汽车在几年内使用的量，这是无可争辩的。飞机排放大量温室气体，造成气候变化和空气污染。减少非必要的航班，特别是以休闲为目的的，可以减少碳排放，并有助于解决这些环境问题。此外，技术的进步使虚拟会议和电话会议成为航空旅行可行的替代方案，进一步证明了减少非必要航班的理由。

However , it is important to note that cars also contribute significantly to environmental pollution . While the fuel consumption of a single car may be less than that of a long-distance flight , the number of cars on the road far exceeds the number of flights . The cumulative impact of car emissions on air quality and climate change should not be overlooked . Limiting the use of cars through the promotion of public transportation , car pooling , and electric vehicles is essential to combat pollution effectively . Furthermore , it is crucial to consider the social and economic implications of solely discouraging non-essential flights . The tourism industry plays a significant role in economic growth , providing employment opportunities and driving revenue for many countries . Completely discouraging tourist travel may have adverse effects on economies heavily dependent on tourism . Therefore , a balanced approach that includes both limiting non-essential flights and promoting sustainable transportation options , such as public transportation and electric cars , would be more pragmatic .

然而，值得注意的是，汽车对环境污染也有很大的影响。虽然一辆汽车的燃料消耗可能比长途飞行的燃料消耗要少，但道路上的汽车数量远远超过了航班的数量。汽车排放对空气质量和气候变化的累积影响不容忽视。通过推广公共交通、拼车和电动汽车来限制汽车的使用，对有效防治污染至关重要。此外，必须考虑到仅仅阻止非必要航班的社会和经济影响。旅游业在经济增长中发挥着重要作用，为许多国家提供就业机会和推动收入。完全阻止旅游可能会对严重依赖旅游业的经济体产生不利影响。因此，一种平衡的方法，包括限制非必要的航班和促进可持续的交通选择，如公共交通和电动汽车，将更加务实。

In conclusion , while I agree that non-essential flights contribute significantly to pollution , I believe that both air travel and car usage should be limited to effectively combat environmental damage . By discouraging unnecessary flights and promoting sustainable transportation options , such as public transportation and electric vehicles , we can make meaningful progress towards reducing carbon emissions and mitigating the consequences of climate change . A comprehensive approach is necessary for a sustainable and environmentally conscious future .

总之，虽然我同意非必要的航班严重造成了污染，但我认为航空旅行和汽车的使用都应该受到限制，以有效地对抗环境破坏。通过减少不必要的航班，推广公共交通和电动汽车等可持续的交通选择，我们可以在减少碳排放和减轻气候变化后果的方面取得有意义的进展。要实现可持续和具有环境意识的未来，必须采取综合办法。

重点词汇/语料：

reduce carbon emissions 减少碳排放

combat pollution 对抗污染

contribute significantly to sth. 对某事有重大贡献;对某事有显著影响

mitigate environmental damage 减轻环境损害

it is indisputable that... 无可争辩的是......

consume a substantial amount of fuel 消耗大量的燃料

(be) equivalent to sth. 相当于某事物

greenhouse gases 温室气体

for leisure purposes 以休闲为目的

address environmental issues 解决环境问题

advancements in technology 技术进步

virtual meetings 虚拟会议

conference calls 电话会议

a feasible alternative to sth. 某事物可行的替代方案

make a case for sth. 为某事提出有利的论据

cumulative impact 累积影响，累积效应

car pooling 拼车

social and economic implications 社会及经济影响

play a significant role in sth. 在某事中扮演重要角色;发挥重要作用

economic growth 经济增长

provide employment opportunities 提供就业机会

drive revenue 推动收入增长

have adverse effects on sth./sb. 对某事/某人有不利影响

(be) heavily dependent on sth. 严重依赖于某事物

a balanced/comprehensive approach 平衡/全面的方法

pragmatic adj. 讲求实际的，务实的

environmentally conscious 有环境意识的;环保意识强的